Sunday, March 28, 2010

MY NEW JERSEY



INSPECTOR GENERAL: MARY JANE COOPER








HAHAHAHA!

http://www.app.com/article/20101011/NEWS03/101011003/NJ-attorney-general-to-form-misconduct-panel-


NJ attorney general to form misconduct panel

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS • October 11, 2010

TRENTON — New Jersey's top law enforcement official is forming a task force to review how police misconduct information is handled.

Attorney General Paula Dow's action comes after The Star-Ledger of Newark reported last month 90,423 complaints were filed between 2000 to 2008. However, only 86,925 cases was disposed of because of inaccurate record keeping.

The problem occurs when unresolved internal affairs complaints are not added into the next year's report.

State American Civil Liberties Union director Deborah Jacobs says she hopes a review of how the information is collected will lead to a broader review of the internal affairs policy.

The ACLU has pressed a federal investigation of the Newark Police Department.





I TOLD MY FORMER NEIGHBOR, CONGRESSMAN BOB FRANKS (R) NOT TO ACCEPT THE PROPERTY AT 20 SPRINGHOLM DRIVE
VILLAS ON THE PARK, BERKELEY HEIGHTS, NEW JERSEY


WHAT HAPPENED WHEN JUDGE JOHN M.BOYLE, THE PRESIDING JUDGE IN THE VILLAS ON THE PARK MATTER LEARNED ABOUT THE HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES EXISTING AT THE COMPLEX? REMEMBER, HIS FAMILY OWNS DEGNAN BOYLE PRUDENTIAL REALTORS AND DOES BUSINESS WITH CONTINENTAL PROPERTIES:























Ex-New Jersey Congressman Franks Dies at Age 58
By John McArdle | April 10, 2010 4:35 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)

Former Rep. Bob Franks (R-N.J.), who ran unsuccessfully for Senate and governor, died late Friday night in a New York hospital, his family announced Saturday. He was 58.

Frank was being treated for an aggressive form of cancer, according to Republican strategist Mike DuHaime, a former aide who is acting as a spokesman for the family.

Franks represented a central New Jersey district in Congress from 1993 to 2001, and was narrowly defeated in the 2000 Senate race by Jon Corzine (D), who spent more than $60 million of his own money on the race. The two later became friendly, and Corzine in a statement Saturday called his former rival "one of a kind -- smart, compassionate, and principled."

According to the Newark Star-Ledger, Franks in a stint as party chairman helped rebuild the New Jersey GOP after Democrat Jim Florio was elected governor in 1989.



















LIARS REALLY NEED TO HAVE BETTER MEMORIES!

From: Smrstjohn@aol.com
Date: November 21, 2006 3:41:24 PM EST
To: synjam@mac.com
Cc: branchburgconsulting@yahoo.com, andrew.zimbler@btopenworld.com
Subject: timing of the meeting: Gwen Please forward to Norrus
Cindy, Gwen and Norrus:

I hope this e-mail finds you well, I am hoping that the 3rd of December at 11:00AM will be appropriate to meet with Andrew Zimbler and his party from England. Cindy can you confirm for me if its possible to have this meeting by you? I need to leave by 1:30PM for a reception for one of Rebecca's cousins that afternoon.

I am looking forward to this meeting and it being prosperous for all concerned. Cindy I am hoping you are felling better and getting your voice back. Not hearing from you has me a bit concerned. Also Cindy have you been in contact with Randy White concerning Panama and has Andrew reached out to Paul Golden? Can you give me an update on these projects before we meet next week.

I want to finish by this e-mail telling you all it has been a real pleasure working with you all over the past year. I am looking to us making the end of this year the new year a profitable one for all of us working together. I want to wish all of you and your families a happy thanksgiving and a healthy, peaceful and beautiful holiday season .

Warmest regards,
John George Habenstein
President JGH Financing Corp.
and Director of Operations of Skylands Consulting















December 2004
Bernard Kerik, The Feds, And The Mob

By James Ridgway de Szigethy

The revelations about 9/11 hero Bernard Kerik in the wake of his withdrawal as Nominee for Director of Homeland Security has stunned Americans nationwide, but none more so than New Yorkers who held such high esteem and affection for the larger-than-life ‘cop’s cop.’ The most troubling of the revelations were exposed in a series by the New York Daily News, which detailed Kerik’s taking of thousands of dollars from a Mobbed-up Informant for the Federal government. That man in question, Lawrence Ray, first showed up on the radar screen in a series by this reporter at AmericanMafia.com beginning in December, 2001, which revealed disturbing campaign finance irregularities of associates of then-New Jersey Senator Robert Torricelli.

Now Lawrence Ray is back in the news, now revealed to have been an Informant for the Feds. Exactly what role did Ray play in the downfall of an American Icon, and what role did the Mafia and the Feds play as well?

The story of Bernard Kerik and his associate Rudolph Giuliani is a complex, often troubling story of career law enforcement officers, organized crime syndicates, and drug dealers and their crooked co-horts in State and Federal government, all intertwined within the volatile New York political scene, in which much is not what it appears to be.

The single event that had the most impact on the professional lives of both Rudolph Giuliani and Bernard Kerik was the crack cocaine epidemic of the 1980s. During that time Giuliani was racking up one of the most impressive records in history as U. S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Giuliani utilized the racketeering statutes passed by Congress in 1970 to begin the systematic dismantling of the five New York Mafia families. Two such prosecutions by Giuliani were the “Commission Trial,” in which the Godfathers of all five families were indicted, and the “Pizza Connection” heroin trafficking case.

Giuliani’s success against the American Mafia had unforeseen consequences. As the traditional Mafia families began to be disrupted, the void that was created was filled by non-traditional organized crime syndicates. The most significant of these was the Cali drug cartel, which flooded the streets of America with crack cocaine. The ‘wholesalers’ of this drug were the Colombian lords who supplied the drugs, which along the Eastern seaboard were distributed by the ‘retailers,’ most of whom were immigrants from the Dominican Republic.

Law enforcement would soon discover that the Cali cartel operated much differently than the Italian Mafia. While the traditional Mafia operated by certain ‘rules,’ including edicts that members of law enforcement and the Media were not to be harmed, the Cali cartel had no such qualms about attacking a cop or a journalist. Manuel de Dios, who had taken on the Cali cartel in his writings at the newspaper El Diario, and other venues, was murdered by the cartel at a New York restaurant in 1992. Edward Byrne, a rookie cop, was assassinated in his patrol car in 1988 as he guarded a witness against the new drug gangs that terrorized New York. The new ethnic drug dealers also resorted to tactics such as falsely accusing cops of civil rights abuses, Police Officers Louis Delli-Pizzi and Michael O’Keefe being just two examples.

The events of October 18, 1988 would stun New Yorkers and have an enormous impact on the career paths of both Giuliani and Kerik. On that fateful day, in two separate, unrelated events, drug dealers in Manhattan murdered two New York City Police Officers, Christopher Hoban and Michael Buczek. Michael Buczek was just 24 years old when he was gunned down by three drug dealers in Washington Heights. Bernard Kerik was then a young Police Officer working the streets against the drug dealers who had taken over the neighborhoods. The three men who murdered Officer Buczek then fled back to their native Dominican Republic, which did not have an extradition treaty with the United States. Kerik vowed to Buczek’s distraught father that whatever it took he would dedicate his life to bringing the killers of Officer Buczek to Justice.

By the next year, the residents of New York were so fed up with the unprecedented crime wave that they were ready to vote into office a tough Prosecutor who promised to clean up New York. That man was Rudy Giuliani, who had already proven himself as an effective prosecutor against the Mafia. This did not escape the Cali drug cartel nor the Italian Mafia, and both were able to affect massive voter fraud in the election of 1989 that stole the election away from Giuliani. An additional 8,000 people would be murdered in New York City during the next four years.

In 1993, Giuliani ran a second time, and scores of New York City cops patrolled the election districts where tens of thousands of fraudulent votes had been cast four years earlier. Once Mayor, Giuliani began the transformation of New York City from one of the most dangerous in America to the “safest large city in America.” Giuliani affected this unprecedented change by bringing in the first of three tough, effective Police Commissioners, William Bratton.

One of the first actions taken by Giuliani and Bratton was the denial of a permit for the John Gotti gang to hold their annual ‘street fair’ outside their headquarters in Queens, which always culminated with an enormous and illegal fireworks display. While this may to some seem insignificant, this and other similar actions by the Giuliani Administration set the tone for the criminal element in New York that it was no longer ‘business as usual’ with organized crime syndicates.

As the Italian Mafia declined in power and influence, the Cali cartel grew in power, which included their bribing of State and Federal members of law enforcement. Bernard Kerik was one who would soon discover how pervasive the Cali cartel’s influence was as he sought to bring Justice to those who murdered Officer Buczek. Toward this end, Officer Kerik teamed up with a sympathetic politician, Guy Molinari, the former Congressman from Staten Island who was then serving as President of the Borough. Molinari utilized his influence in Congress in efforts to create political pressure within Washington to coerce the Dominican Republic to turn over the murderers of Buczek. A deal was eventually struck regarding one of the murderers, but the Cali cartel, who by this time had murdered journalist Manuel de Dios, could not afford to have triggerman Daniel Mirambeaux returned to the United States to face trial. Mirambeaux imply knew too much about how the Cartel had corrupted members of law enforcement and politicians in New York. Thus, Mirambeaux “committed suicide” by hurling himself down several flights of stairs while in police custody and with his hands cuffed behind him.

Things then went from bad to worse for Kerik and Molinari. The “Feds” in the office of the U. S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York then launched an investigation of Molinari, who had championed a member of law enforcement falsely accused of civil rights violations by drug dealers who belonged to the Cali cartel. The Feds tried to convince a government Informant to wear a wire on Molinari and convince him to offer her a job in exchange for information she had provided on the Cali cartel and their corruption of New York officials. The woman refused and reported the attempted set-up to Molinari. Other New York residents also went to Molinari claiming similar intimidation by the Feds to set-up the Borough President. The female Informant in question later proved her credibility by working for the Feds in another State in successful prosecutions of drug trafficking syndicates.

A furious Molinari took this story to the Media, and in April, 1995 the New York Post ran the story: “Guy Molinari Fumes: FBI Tried to Set Me Up!” “It’s outrageous!” Molinari said. “If they will do this to me, an elected official, I hate to think what they might do to a member of the general public!”

The attempt by the Feds to set-up Borough President Molinari would be just the first of several corruption scandals to emerge in the 1990s regarding the Feds in the Eastern District and their protection of drug dealers. During this time, an internal war erupted within the Colombo Mafia Family in Brooklyn. Before the war was over at least 11 people were dead, including an innocent bystander. Three Federal trials that resulted from this Mob war would be de-railed because of the FBI’s improper relationship with Greg Scarpa, a drug dealer and hitman for the Colombo Family who had been protected for decades by the FBI because of his status as an FBI Informant.

The first troubled Colombo war trial began in June 1994. Alphonse "Allie Boy" Persico was acquitted of charges he instigated the war - from prison - after Greg Scarpa, on his deathbed due to AIDS, issued a sworn Affidavit that exonerated him.

In the second Colombo War Trial, William "Wild Bill" Cutolo and 6 members of his crew faced racketeering murder charges. "Big Sal" Miciotta testified under cross examination that while ‘protected’ as an FBI Informant he continued his loan sharking and extortion rackets, as well as trafficking drugs. The defendants in the case claimed they were only acting in self-defense against a renegade FBI informant/Mafia hitman, Greg Scarpa. Cutolo and the members of his crew were acquitted.

The New York Times then joined the chorus of those questioning the relationship between Scarpa and the FBI. The Times noted that during his 35-year life of crime and 10 arrests Scarpa had spent only a total of 30 days in jail.

In May, 1995 the Third Colombo War trial began. Vic and John Orena, steel company executive Thomas Petrizzo, and four associates faced murder conspiracy charges. In her opening arguments Assistant U. S. Attorney Ellen Corcella admitted to the jury that FBI agent de Vecchio had an unusual relationship with drug dealer Greg Scarpa and leaked confidential information to him. FBI agent Howard Leadbetter testified that he and agents Chris Favo and Jeffrey Tomlinson reported to their superiors that de Vecchio had tried to obstruct a probe of Scarpa. Favo told the Court that he was convinced de Vecchio had committed crimes by leaking information to Scarpa.

Despite this evidence, De Vecchio was not charged with leaking information to the Mafia. Instead, De Vecchio’s subordinate on the Task Force, NYPD Detective Joe Simone, was indicted on those charges. It took the jury in his case just two hours to agree that Simone was not the Mob’s source of information on the Task Force. 10 of the 12 jurors stood outside the Federal Courthouse in the cold, November rain to offer their support to Detective Simone and his family. Simone’s attorney claimed that “Big Sal” Miciotta had set up his client and Miciotta was eventually removed from the Witness Protection Program once he was detected committing Perjury.

The jurors in the Orena trial acquitted all defendants on all charges and demanded of the Prosecutors why it was de Vecchio had not been indicted. "They all believed there was a cover-up, and many jurors wondered how come de Vecchio wasn’t indicted," defense attorney James La Rossa told reporters. Defense attorney Jerry Shargel told the New York Post: "The jurors were all just absolutely shocked by the testimony about the relationship between de Vecchio and Scarpa!" "The evidence against de Vecchio was far stronger than the evidence against the defendants on trial!" Juror #186 told the New York Daily News, "Something like this really knocks the credibility of the FBI!" Juror Nancy Wenz stated: "If the FBI’s like this, Society is really in trouble!"

On May 15, 1996 the New York Post stunned readers with the revelation that agent de Vecchio still had access to classified documents, despite the Court testimony of his own agents that he had given secret information to the Mob. The information became public as part of attorney Gerald Shargel’s efforts to win a new trial for Victor Orena, Sr., the jailed former head of the Colombo Family. When at last Shargel got his chance to cross-examine de Vecchio during the Appeal hearing, de Vecchio repeatedly invoked his right under the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination.

In February 1997 de Vecchio again testified in a hearing for a new trial for Orena, but this time under a grant of Immunity, which required him to answer all questions. While being questioned by Defense attorneys, de Vecchio responded dozens of times with the answer, "I don’t recall!" At the beginning of the hearing, the New York Post ran a shocking story regarding how de Vecchio was caught illegally trafficking guns in the State of Maryland back in 1975. When questioned about this transaction, de Vecchio claimed at the Orena hearing that he did not know that his transporting guns across State lines and selling them without a license was illegal. The FBI and authorities in Maryland decided at the time not to prosecute de Vecchio, who had in his personnel file glowing reports about his performance signed by the late FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover.

As these scandals of the Feds in Brooklyn were slowly being uncovered in the Colombo Family war trials, Bernard Kerik and Guy Molinari continued their lobbying efforts to have the murderers of Officer Buczek returned to the United States. In 1996, the Feds in Brooklyn opened an investigation into a stock “pump and dump” scam being run by various associates of the Colombo and Gambino Mafia families. The Feds utilized the services of a new Informant, Lawrence Ray, who had a casual relationship with a man named Frank DiTommaso, who, with his brother, owned a waste management company called Interstate Industrial. Frank DiTommaso was also an acquaintance of Guy Molinari and Bernard Kerik.

During the next three years, Ray developed a close friendship with Bernard Kerik, while at the same time providing information to the Feds about the Mafia stock scam. While DiTommaso was not impressed with Ray, he eventually, at Kerik’s urging, hired Ray at $100,000 a year to provide lobbying services and also hired Kerik’s brother as well. By 1998, Ray had become so close to Kerik that he served as Best Man at his Wedding. Kerik by this time had been promoted by Giuliani as Commissioner of the Corrections Department. The Daily News reported that Ray lavished thousands of dollars worth of gifts upon his pal Kerik, donations that Kerik did not report as required by city guidelines.

While this relationship was developing, Commissioner Kerik was strengthening his bond with Mayor Giuliani. William Bratton’s successor as Police Commissioner, Howard Safir, was not enjoying the reputation that Bratton had established. Police Department scandals such as the brutal assault on Haitian immigrant Abner Louima and the shooting of unarmed immigrant Amadou Diallo had created a hostile environment within various communities of New York City. As the time approached for Howard Safir to retire, Giuliani increasingly viewed Kerik as his next Police Commissioner.

By 2000, Interstate Industrial and Lawrence Ray had captured the attention of this reporter. In March, 2000, Lawrence Ray was indicted by the Eastern District of New York for his very minor participation in a Mafia ‘pump and dump’ stock scam. This indictment marked the first time that the name “Lawrence Ray” appeared in the public domain. Here is the first excerpt regarding Lawrence Ray written by this reporter in the feature: “In the Money: Senator Robert Torricelli and His Campaign Contributors” published at AmericanMafia.com in December, 2001:

“In response to the growing investigations of Torricelli campaign financiers, Torricelli founded in 2000 a separate Legal Defense Fund. . . . According to FEC documents, waste management contractors Frank and Peter DiTommaso also contributed $10,000 to this fund. This gift is even more generous given the statement issued by a spokesperson for the Senator, who says Torricelli does not even know these two men. At the time of the donations, the DiTommaso brothers, owners of Interstate Industrial Corporation, were the subjects of a Federal, New York City, and New Jersey Casino Control Commission investigation into allegations of ties to the Mafia.

The City investigation was prompted by a $30 million contract sought by the DiTommaso brothers’ business to assist in the closing of the Fresh Kills landfill on Staten Island, an illegal Mob-controlled landfill that was only closed after the election of former Mafia Prosecutor Rudolph Giuliani as Mayor of New York. The City as a result of their investigation canceled the $30 million contract.

The Federal investigation of the DiTommaso brothers concerned their purchase of a Staten Island waste station controlled by Edward Garafola, who is married to the sister of former Gambino Family Underboss Sammy "The Bull" Gravano. Garafola was indicted in March 2000 along with Lawrence Ray, an executive of the DiTommaso brothers’ Interstate Industrial Corporation, and Daniel Persico, nephew of Colombo Family Godfather Carmine "The Snake" Persico, on Federal charges involving a $40 million stock ‘pump and dump’ scam. Interstate Industrial Corporation was also denied a contract by the New Jersey Casino Control Commission in 2000 to perform work on an Atlantic City gambling casino.

Federal Election Commission records also show that Frank DiTommaso contributed $1,000 to the Torricelli campaign on March 26, 1999 and that DiTommaso Family members made several other $1,000 contributions that year. The DiTommaso brothers have denied they have ties to the Mafia and their integrity has been publicly vouched for by Staten Island Borough President Guy Molinari.”

In the year after this first report, the allegations regarding Torricelli were picked up by the ‘mainstream Media’ once Torricelli was under a Federal probe while at the same time running for re-election to the Senate. Torricelli was never charged with a crime although the revelations about his campaign finances prompted him to quit his Senate re-election bid.

Former Commissioner Kerik quit his bid to be Director of Homeland Security shortly after being informed by the New York Daily News and New York Times that both newspapers were looking into his finances, including his dealings with Lawrence Ray.

Much has happened between the time Ray was indicted in 2000 and his surfacing in the Kerik matter. First, Kerik distanced himself from Ray once he was indicted. It is not yet clear at what point Kerik learned that Ray, while funneling thousands of dollars to him, was at the same time an Informant for the Feds in Brooklyn providing information about the Mafia. This must have caused considerable concern for Kerik given that this was the same office that tried to set up Guy Molinari.

On 9/11, Bernard Kerik became a national hero, along with Mayor Giuliani, because of his steady and effective leadership at a time of unprecedented chaos. However, long before he became a national hero, Kerik was a man revered by those whose paths he has crossed in New York. After over a decade of relentless lobbying, Kerik and Molinari were at last able to affect the extradition of the two men involved in the murder of Police Officer Michael Buczek. Police Commissioner Kerik personally handcuffed one of the suspects upon his arrival in the United States. Both men were found guilty and sentenced to 25 years to Life in prison.

EPILOGUE

Despite the various allegations about the conduct of Bernard Kerik, those who know him best, including former Mayor Giuliani, are adamant that Kerik is a good, decent, and honest man. The monies Kerik accepted from Federal Informant Lawrence Ray were taken in the form of checks, which leaves a paper trail. Ray, who has never previously spoken to the Media, did not hesitate to display those cancelled checks to the New York Daily News once Kerik’s nomination was in trouble. As troubling as this is to some, had this money been in exchange for official actions on his part as Commissioner, such acceptance of funds could be construed as bribes. Experience has shown that crooked officials do not take checks as gifts - they insist on cash. Despite the hostile actions by some Feds regarding Kerik and his associate Guy Molinari, Bernard Kerik has not been charged with a crime.

Police Officer Michael Buczek is remembered by a baseball field in his name in Washington Heights, and by the Michael Buczek Foundation, chaired by fellow former narcotics Officer Bernard Kerik.

Related stories by this author:

‘In the Money: Senator Robert Torricelli and His Campaign Contributors’
http://americanmafia.com/Feature_Articles_177.html

‘The American Mafia’s Worst Nightmare’
http://americanmafia.com/Feature_Articles_282.html

‘Crime Scene - World Trade Center’
http://americanmafia.com/Feature_Articles_275.html

‘Mob War: Murder, Deception and Intrigue Inside New York’s Colombo Mafia Family’
http://americanmafia.com/Feature_Articles_9.html


THE JURY IS STILL OUT > PAULA DOW, ATTORNEY GENERAL






Attorney general, Essex County prosecutor to review Newark police internal affairs

Published: Tuesday, September 14, 2010, 8:32 PM

Chris Megerian/Statehouse Bureau

NEWARK —The attorney general and the Essex County prosecutor have launched a joint review of the Newark Police Department’s internal affairs operation, following a week of allegations that police were not properly reporting results of cases and almost never sustain serious misconduct complaints against officers.
"Citizens have the right to have their complaints raised and recorded and appropriately acted on," Attorney General Paula Dow said today. "If that’s not happening, we need to see where the problem is, especially in a city that’s seeing an uptick in major crimes."

The review comes after the American Civil Liberties Union last week petitioned the U.S. Department of Justice for a federal investigation of the police department, saying it needs a federal monitor to stem police misconduct.

On Monday The Star-Ledger reported that Newark police have not reported the outcome of one of every 10 internal affairs complaints against its officers for almost a decade, a violation of state guidelines. That means it’s impossible to discern from annual public reports whether 1,315 out of 12,905 misconduct allegations resulted in disciplinary action.

Law enforcement officials said cases aren’t being dropped, but admitted there could be more scrutiny of the annual internal affairs reports all police departments are required to file.

PREVIOUS COVERAGE:

• Newark Internal Affairs Division summary report (PDF)

• Reports show 1 in 10 complaints against Newark police officers are not fully reported to N.J.

• City officials support federal monitor of Newark Police Department

• Newark police director rejects calls for federal oversight of department after ACLU's accusations

• ACLU accuses Newark police of false arrests, excessive force

"It’s a statewide problem," Acting Essex County Prosecutor Robert Laurino said. "It’s not just confined to Essex."

The Newark police department said in a statement: "We will, of course, cooperate fully with the Attorney General while they review the issue."

City officials have said the police department has been reforming and does not need a federal monitor.

Each police department files the annual reports with a county prosecutor, which then compiles a county-wide summary to send to the Attorney General’s Office. But despite multiple levels of potential review, a Star-Ledger analysis found accounting errors almost every year in Newark’s reports and in the statewide data.

Laurino said clerical personnel usually fill out the forms for his office.

"Because of that, it was never really picked up at our level or at the attorney general’s office," he said. "We were unaware there had been that kind of a reporting problem."

He said they are examining internal affairs procedures and a county official in charge of internal affairs may directly review reports in the future.

Police experts said the lack of reliable internal affairs information undermines external oversight, a key piece of state policy on police discipline. And critics said law enforcement officials are not paying enough attention to internal affairs.

"There’s no way to tell me this is the single most important document you have in internal affairs and you can’t even add the numbers correctly," said Richard Rivera, a former police officer who works with the ACLU on police issues. "Police accountability and the integrity of internal affairs are not top priorities."

The ACLU raised the issue last week when asking for a federal investigation of the Newark police.

"I’m glad the attention it’s gotten has motivated swift action," said Deborah Jacobs, executive director of the ACLU in New Jersey,

The ACLU’s petition said Newark internal affairs sustained only one allegation of excessive force, differential treatment or improper arrest, entry or search in 2008 and 2009.

Dow said her office’s review of internal affairs accounting will start in Newark but may expand, saying "if these issues are prevalent in other areas, we’ll look there as well."

Statewide records from 2000 to 2008 show 90,423 complaints recorded but only 86,925 dispositions, the Star-Ledger analysis shows. That means the outcomes of almost 4 percent of cases are not available in public reports. The problem occurs when internal affairs complaints recorded as unresolved at the end of each year are not added to the next year’s annual report.

Friday, February 26, 2010

BEFORE Honorable Judge Ronald Reba (I believe he was)

Attorney, Scott D. Rodgers Somerset County New Jersey
MILLER ROBERTSON AND RODGERS




MY WONDERFUL ATTORNEY..
REPRESENTED BY NINA ROSSI, ESQ

SCOTT D RODGERS, ESQ. WAS THE ATTORNEY FOR VALLEY NATIONAL BANK, WHERE ROBERT A. FRANCO, ESQ. AND NORMAN TAUGER CASHED A CHECK DIRECTED FOR CINDY (JAMPEL) AND CONVERTED TO RANDI FRANCO. ACCORDING TO NORMAN TAUGER, YVONNE, THE BANK MANAGER OKAYED THE CHECK BECAUSE YVONNE ALWAYS TOOK CARE OF NORMAN SINCE HE ALLEGEDLY GAVE HER A WEDDING PRESENT. I SAW THE ATTENTION SHE GAVE HIM WITH MY OWN TWO EYES.

I REPORTED THE THEFT TO THE SOMERSET COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE. ROBERT FRANCO ALLEGEDLY HAD A FRIEND WORKING THERE AS AN AP , SO A COVER-UP ENSUED. I GOT THE RECORDS THROUGH AN OPRA REQUEST, READING WHAT THE SOMERSET COUNTY DETECTIVES WERE DOING. MUCH LATER I FILED A COMPLAINT THROUGH THE GOVERNMENT RECORDS COMMITTEE....QUESS WHO REPRESENTED THE SOMERSET COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE...SCOTT RODGERS, ESQ. WHAT A COINCIDENCE, THE VERY SAME LAWYER WHO PROTECTED THE BANK, PROTECTED THE PROSECUTORS OFFICE.
IS THIS AN FBI MATTER/



Saturday, August 22, 2009

THE DEVIL MADE ME DO IT!

August 20, 2009
Chertoff: Calling Marra political 'a stretch


Early life
Chertoff was born in Elizabeth, New Jersey to Rabbi Gershon Baruch Chertoff (1915-1996), the former leader of the Congregation B'nai Israel in Elizabeth and Talmud scholar, and Livia Chertoff (née Eisen), El Al flight attendant. His paternal grandfather, Rabbi Paul Chertoff (who emigrated with his parents from czarist Russia, present day Belarus) was a noted Talmud scholar.[3]

Chertoff went to the Jewish Educational Center in Elizabeth as well as the Pingry School. He later attended Harvard University, where he was a research assistant on John Hart Ely's book Democracy and Distrust, graduating in 1975. He spent one year of this studying at the London School of Economics and Political Science in the United Kingdom. He then graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law School in 1978, going on to clerk for appellate judge Murray Gurfein for a year before clerking for United States Supreme Court Justice William Brennan from 1979 to 1980. He worked in private practice with Latham & Watkins from 1980 to 1983 before being hired as a prosecutor by Rudolph Giuliani, then the U.S. attorney for Manhattan, working on Mafia and political corruption-related cases. In the mid 1990s, Chertoff returned to Latham & Watkins for a brief period, founding the firm's office in Newark, New Jersey.

A former federal prosecutor and top Justice Department official from New Jersey said today it was “a stretch” to say that a federal prosecutor discussing why corruption happens was an ethical violation designed to help Republican Chris Christie’s anti-corruption campaign for governor.

Michael Chertoff, who also served as a federal judge and U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security, generally echoed the comments that reportedly have put acting U.S. Attorney Ralph Marra in hot water with Washington.

The Associated Press, quoting unnamed sources, reported Tuesday that the Office of Professional Responsibility in the Justice Department was investigating whether Marra violated department guidelines governing what comments are appropriate about pending cases.

Speaking at a news conference last month following the arrest of 29 people in a public corruption investigation, Marra had said the state could easily pass reforms to make prosecutors’ jobs easier, but does not because “too many people profit off the system the way it is and so they have no incentive to change it.”

Christie, who was U.S. Attorney for more than seven years before launching his bid for governor, made similar comments as a candidate and throughout his term as a prosecutor.

Chertoff said he found federal laws adequate when he investigated corruption, and noted that U.S. attorneys cannot prosecute people for violations of state law. But he also said corruption in New Jersey has more organic roots, including the proliferation of local governments and regulations, and voters need to be engaged and cannot rely on prosecutors alone to oust the corrupt.

Chertoff now runs a private security consulting firm. He was asked about the flap at the National Press Club before he appeared on a panel about the privatization of intelligence gathering. Here’s what he said:


Q: Did Marra cross a line with his comments?
A: I’m not going to comment on something somebody said that I didn’t see or hear.
Generally there are a set of rules, you’re not supposed to comment, give a personal opinion about someone’s guilt or innocence, you’re not supposed to talk about evidence that hasn’t actually been made public in court.
So those are pretty clear rules.
I think every U.S. attorney always has a little rhetorical flourish. I don’t ever remember seeing a U.S. attorney, including myself, get out and say we’ve arrested people for horrendous acts of terrorism, we don’t want to comment about whether we think it’s good or bad. That’s obviously a little foolish.
So I think the key’s generally to avoid saying anything that would prejudice the defendant in the case. Hear the audio clip:



Q: Does the fact Mr. Marra’s former supervisor is a candidate for governor running on the a reform platform--
A: [Interrupting]I think it’s a stretch to try to fit this is into a political discussion.
The rules are – Obviously a US attorney won’t come out and say I support a political candidate, but you know there’s always an election in this country, and if the rule is you can’t say anything that might be a topic of public interest then you wouldn’t be able to have a press conference.
So I think generally the rule is not to comment on guilt or innocence, not to talk about evidence that’s not in the case. But I think general comments about the significance of the case, whether it’s a corruption case or a bank fraud case or a securities fraud case, a mortgage fraud case, that’s kind of common frankly.
Hear the audio clip:



Q: What about corruption. You must have had one or two corruption busts in your term.
A: I was thinking about this. We had the Essex County executive, we had the mayor of Jersey City, the mayor of Passaic, the mayor of Parsippany and numerous other public officials, so it seems to be a feature of life in the U.S. attorney's office to have a series of corruption cases.
Hear the audio clip:



Q: Why do you think that is?
A: I do think there is -- it’s a hard answer. I don’t know that New Jersey is actually worse than other places. If you look at what’s going on in Chicago, if you look at what’s gone on in New Orleans, if you look at what’s gone on even in Pennsylvania, there’s a lot of corruption. One argument I’ve heard that probably has some merit is there are a lot of government, levels of government in New Jersey. You have hundreds of levels of government. Just statistically that’s going to create opportunities that a state that has less government mechanisms isn’t going to have.
The second thing is, the more permitting, the more legal requirements you have the more people are going to be tempted to try to get around the rules. In a way, the more legal hurdles you have to jump through to do a project, the more temptation there’s going to be for people to circumvent the bureaucracy. I mean, in a way, too much regulation actually creates an environment in which people decide they want to cut through it by breaking the law.
So you want smart regulation, you don’t necessarily want to have overly complicated regulation.
Hear the audio clip:



Q: Did you get the sense that the people who had the power to make laws that would make it easier for you to crack down on this were not doing it because they were benefiting from the system?
A: I thought our, we use federal law, so I can’t speak to the state laws. Those weren’t important for us. And there was plenty of federal law in terms of what we had to do. I don’t know if the issue is law as much as it is the character of people who are in office. But I will say that to some degree it is up to the voter. The voter in those areas of New Jersey which are repeatedly the scene of corruption, over and over again, and sometimes the public re-elects those who are actually indicted or shrugs their shoulders, somehow or other that is the public not taking its role seriously. If the public cares enough about this issue, then the public’s going to start to really insist that candidates walk the walk as well as talk the talk. And in the end, in a democracy, that’s what you want to rely upon. The elected the people, or the people who elect, the electors. You don’t want to have a situation where the voter shrugs his or her shoulders and says well, if someone’s corrupt, the prosecutors are going to get them. That’s not a healthy system.
Hear the audio clip:



August 20, 2009 | Permalink
Technorati Tags: Chris Christie, Michael Chertoff, Ralph Marra
TRACKBACK

Updated: May 13, 2005, 6:22 PM ET
Wilf built wealth in shopping centers
Email Print Share
Associated Press
NEWARK, N.J. -- The New Jersey man leading a consortium trying to buy the Minnesota Vikings is the son of Holocaust survivors whose family business is among the largest owners of shopping centers in North America.

Apparently a newcomer to football, Zygmunt Wilf serves on the boards of several Jewish educational and charitable institutions that have been the recipients of millions of dollars from the family, including Yad Vashem, the Holocaust memorial in Jerusalem.

Associates expressed surprise at his interest in the team, and that he has become the public face of the prospective buyers, since the family is known for keeping a low profile.

"They're incredibly quiet, wonderful philanthropists. They don't get into the limelight in major ways. They are an incredible family," said Leonard Bielory, the immediate past president of Congregation Israel in Springfield, the Orthodox synagogue where Wilf and his wife and four children attend services not far from their north Jersey home.

"I know he enjoys sports. He enjoys the outdoors tremendously," hiking at the Delaware Water Gap in New Jersey as well as near a home in Aspen, Colo., Bielory said. "He's a very outgoing guy."

Wilf, a lawyer who is in his 50s, prefers to be called Zygi (pronounced Ziggy), associates said.

Wilf was not the lead person in the group seeking to buy the Vikings when the deal was announced three months ago. That role was held by Arizona businessman Reggie Fowler. Wilf was one of four limited partners.

The reason for the switch has not been disclosed, but league rules require that the general partner must have at least a 30 percent stake in the franchise.

Red McCombs, who is selling the club for a reported $625 million, said Wilf now heads the group. McCombs said he expects league owners to approve the purchase at their spring meetings on May 24-25 in Washington, D.C.

"It's really quite an unusual situation, particularly since the guy that was announced [Fowler] would have been the first black majority owner of an NFL franchise," said Dan Kaplan, NFL writer for Sports Business Journal.

Wilf's business background has raised questions as to whether he is more interested in building a shopping mall around a new stadium than operating the Vikings, Kaplan said.

"Guys who buy football teams usually do it because they love football; they usually don't do it because they think it will be a great investment, although it has turned out to be a phenomenal investment for some of them," Kaplan said.

John K. Mara, the chief operating officer of the New York Giants and a member of the family that owns half the team, said he does not think he has met Wilf. "As far as I know he has not reached out to anyone here," Mara said in an e-mail.

Wilf, chief operating officer of Garden Commercial Properties, did not return messages left at his Short Hills office this week.

In comments published May 7 in the Star Tribune of Minneapolis, Wilf said he would not move the team and that Fowler was still part of the consortium.

"We are still in discussion regarding the structure of the group," Wilf told the newspaper. "The NFL is fully aware of everything."

He declined to discuss his net worth or the value of his company. "We have a family business that has operated over 50 years," he said. "I have made it a practice not to discuss financial issues."

The company had the 17th-largest amount of leasable space, 25.9 million square feet, among North American owners of shopping centers in 2004, up from No. 21 in 2003, according to Shopping Centers Today, an industry journal. It has 109 properties in at least five states, primarily New Jersey, but also Florida, Georgia, Illinois and New York.

David Bodamer, managing editor of Retail Traffic, another industry journal, noted that nearly all the company's competitors are publicly traded. "They're a private owner, which is rare for this industry, and they've historically kept a low profile," Bodamer said.

In five years covering retailing, "I've never spoken to anyone over there," he said.

Garden Commercial Properties had revenues of $101.1 million and 5,000 employees in the last year, according to Hoover's Inc.

It acquired about half of the properties and developed the rest, and has anchor tenants that include Home Depot, Lowe's, Walgreen's and Wal-Mart, Hoover's said.

The company is a subsidiary of Garden Homes Management, a home and apartment developer founded in the early 1950s by brothers Joseph and Harry Wilf.

Zygmunt is one of Joseph's sons. In a 2000 interview with Retail Traffic, Zygmunt Wilf said the company will continue to build its business one shopping center at a time.

"Replicating our success is neither a predictable science nor smoke-and-mirrors magic," he told the journal. "It's the result of skill acquired over time, and only after gaining vast experience in the market. It presumes a mastery of our industry, along with a reputation for stability and integrity that, taken together, have become the cornerstone in our ability to attract strong anchor stores and successful tenants to our projects."

"It is the Garden Commercial way of doing both business and life," he said, "which we hope to pass on to our children."

Wilf spoke at Yad Vashem in March when the memorial opened a $56 million museum for which the Wilf family gave over $1 million, said Shraga Mekel, director of development of the American Society for Yad Vashem.

"He is one of the most important leaders of the society," Mekel said.

Wilf was elected in fall 2003 to the Board of Overseers of Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, which is based in the Bronx, N.Y. Yeshiva's campus in Washington Heights is named for the entire Wilf family,

Another longtime beneficiary of the family's donations is the Jewish Educational Center of Elizabeth, an Orthodox temple and 1,000-student day school whose graduates include Michael Chertoff, now U.S. homeland security secretary.

Joseph Wilf is still a congregant, and Zygmunt is on the board of trustees, executive director Steven Karp said.

The Wilf Family Building houses part of the girls' high school, while a wing of the boys' high school is named for Harry Wilf.

Rabbi Elazar Teitz, dean of the school, said he has known the family since the 1950s. He said he has not kept records on how much they have donated, but said it is in the millions of dollars.

Zygmunt Wilf only attended the school through sixth grade, the rabbi said.

"He had the ordinary, healthy American's interest in sports. I didn't notice any particular interest in football," Teitz said.


WAKE UP WITH FLEAS
Profile: Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff
Aggressive Prosecutor Named to Be 'Key Leader in War on Terror'
February 15, 2005
1 comment
Font Size PrintRSSE-mailShare this story with friends
FacebookRedditTwitterStumbleUponMore
Michael Chertoff made his name by getting the bosses of the five biggest Mafia families in New York off the streets. In his new job of secretary of Homeland Security, he will be responsible for keeping America's streets safe from terrorists.

"Mike has shown a deep commitment to the cause of justice and an unwavering determination to protect the American people," Bush said when he announced the nomination. "Mike has also been a key leader in the war on terror."

The Senate approved his nomination in a 98-0 vote on Feb. 15, 2005. He succeeds Tom Ridge as head of the Department of Homeland Security.

"I believe the secretary of Homeland Security will have to be mindful of the need to reconcile the imperatives of security with the preservation of liberty and privacy," Chertoff said in a prepared statement for a hearing on his nomination before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.

Chertoff, 51, has been a federal judge on the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals since 2003 and was the director of the Justice Department's criminal division from 2001 to 2003.

He has been concerned with the terrorist threat against the United States for a long time, and in 1996 argued in an article published in the New Jersey Law Journal titled "Tools Against Terrorism" that law enforcement and prosecutors need greater leeway in their pursuit of suspected terrorists, even if that involved a limiting of some of the civil liberties that Americans have grown accustomed to.

He is known as an aggressive prosecutor and a good manager, though his critics have claimed that he has sometimes gone overboard, such as in the prosecution of Zacarias Moussaoui, the only person to be charged in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorists attacks; his opposition to allowing judges discretion in deciding sentences; and his position, argued in an amicus brief he co-wrote for a case before the Supreme Court, that there is no constitutional right to be free of coercive questioning by the police.

.

Giuliani Link
Like former New York City Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik, Bush's first nominee for the Homeland Security job, Chertoff first gained attention as a result of his association with Rudolph Giuliani. Chertoff was the former New York City mayor's assistant when Giuliani was a federal prosecutor working on a case against organized crime families.

Just as the case was due to go to trial in 1985, Giuliani decided to lead the prosecution of a municipal corruption case, leaving Chertoff in charge of the organized crime prosecution. The assistant prosecutor got the conviction, and the headlines that went with putting top-level mobsters behind bars.

His success eventually brought him the job of top U.S. prosecutor in New Jersey, where he went after electronics tycoon "Crazy Eddie" Antar, who was convicted of racketeering and securities fraud.

He went into private practice in 1994, as a partner with Latham & Watkins, but was also the special counsel for the U.S. Senate Whitewater Commission, which investigated the involvement of President Clinton and members of his staff in an Arkansas real estate company.

His campaign appearances for Republican presidential candidate Bob Dole, who ran against Clinton in 1996, raised some eyebrows among other former special prosecutors, who questioned whether that was appropriate.

Chertoff returned to government service in 2001, taking over as chief of the Justice Department's criminal division, and has pushed for greater powers for law enforcement to pursue and prosecute suspected terrorists.

Even though he has been an aggressive champion of the administration's legal tactics in the war on terror, he joined with a group of other conservative lawyers who criticized Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Bush for the indefinite detention of enemy combatants at Guantanamo Bay.

Chertoff, who was born in Elizabeth, N.J., on Nov. 28, 1953, received his bachelor's degree from Harvard University in 1975 and his law degree from Harvard University in 1978.

Wednesday, April 2, 2008

KUDOOS TO ANNE MILGRAM

I LOVE THIS WOMAN!





Bergen County attorney sentenced to 15 years for stealing $4M in client funds to gamble

by MaryAnn Spoto/The Star-Ledger
Friday June 19, 2009, 5:05 PM

A former Bergen County attorney was sentenced today to 15 years in prison for stealing $4 million in client funds he gambled away in Atlantic City.

Michael Rumore, 50, of Lyndhurst expressed remorse and apologized before Superior Court Judge Harry B. Carroll, sitting in Bergen County, imposed the sentence. Rumore told the judge that in using his clients' real-estate closing fees to gamble, he let down his family, his profession and himself, according to his attorney, Anthony P. Alfano of Lyndhurst.

Rumore, who practiced law out of a basement office in his home, pleaded guilty Jan. 2 to money laundering and theft by failure to make required disposition of property received.

He will be required to serve at least three years of his sentence in state prison before becoming eligible for parole, Alfano said.

Mike DererAPNew Jersey Attorney General Anne Milgram at a news conference in Newark on Thursday, Feb. 5.
"Rather than upholding the law and the interests of his clients as he was sworn to do as an attorney, this defendant stole $4 million in real estate closing funds which he used to gamble," Attorney General Anne Milgram said after the sentencing. "We will continue to aggressively prosecute white collar crime."

Between April 16, 2007, and Aug. 13, 2008, Rumore received more than $4 million from various mortgage companies to effectuate closings on real estate transactions. Instead of using the money to close the deals, he transferred the funds from his attorney trust account to his personal and business accounts and used them to feed his gambling addiction, authorities said.

Alfano said Rumore primarily played high-stakes slot machines, losing $400 with each bet.

"He would lose it in seconds," Alfano said after the sentencing. "Some days he would spend 72 hours without sleeping. Someone in the hole for millions of dollars believes he can pay it back. They always believe they can hit the big one and pay it back."

On the few occasions he did win, Rumore returned the money to his trust account, but it was never enough to cover what he stole, Alfano said.

The affected housing sales, about 20 in all, were completed, but the title companies lost the money because they were responsible for insuring the transactions.

Although Rumore admitted to stealing $4 million, he will be responsible for repaying the title companies $6.2 million, the actual amount of the thefts.

Rumore has surrendered his law licenses in New Jersey and New York

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Somerset County New Jersey

Ex-Judge Charged With Drunkenness in Court, Disorderly Conduct in Public
Mary Pat Gallagher
New Jersey Law Journal
03-19-2008

Richard Sasso, formerly a judge in four Somerset County, N.J., towns, faces a seven-count ethics complaint charging he showed up drunk in court, bullied lawyers and litigants from the bench, acted disorderly in a go-go bar and committed other violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct and court rules.

Sasso resigned his posts in Bound Brook, Bridgewater, Warren and Watchung in January amid litigation and ethics grievances over his conduct as a judge. He cited health problems and the demands of private practice.

Some of the alleged misconduct is central to a former Warren municipal prosecutor's sexual harassment and whistleblower suit against former Acting Gov. Donald DiFrancesco's law firm, claiming she was fired for making public complaints about Sasso.

The Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct's complaint, filed March 13, accuses Sasso of presiding over court sessions while under the influence of drugs or alcohol on Dec. 6, 2006, in Bridgewater and April 17, 2007, in Watchung, and of being so impaired that he had to be driven home afterward.

On the Dec. 6 date, his inebriation allegedly resulted in the cancellation of the evening court session in Bound Brook.

Drinking was also allegedly involved in a disorderly persons incident at Torpedo's Go-Go Bar in Bound Brook, on Nov. 29, 2007, around 1:30 a.m. The bar's Web site describes it as a "NY Style Gentlemen's Club" and on St. Patrick's Day, when the complaint was issued, it advertised "100 Hot Irish Ladies."

The ACJC alleges that Sasso refused to comply with the bartender's request to present his driver's license before he could start running a tab. When the bartender insisted, Sasso invoked his position to intimidate the bartender and manager, asking "Do you know who I am? I'm the Bound Brook judge." He added that he had left the bar alone for three years, and when the bartender called the manager, Sasso said, "Do you know who I am? I can make problems for you," according to the complaint.

The Bound Brook police were called and Sasso was forcibly removed from the premises, ripping off part of the bar's ledge as he exited. He was taken to the Bound Brook police station with an unidentified companion where he called Watchung Police Chief Russell Leffert for a ride home, the complaint says.

Several counts of the complaint concern Sasso's treatment of people in his courtroom.

One alleged object of his wrath was Patricia Bombelyn, of Perez & Bombelyn in New Brunswick. The complaint describes at length an Aug. 8, 2007, incident in Bound Brook Municipal Court where Sasso accused her "in a hostile tone" of having given his staff a hard time during a telephone call earlier that day.

In the face of Bombelyn's denials and attempts to explain, Sasso became "increasingly belligerent" to the point where he hit her with $500 in contempt sanctions, which were to increase if not paid within two days, says the complaint. The sanctions were overturned on appeal.

The complaint also alleges two similar incidents in which Sasso's "hostile manner" with defendants violated Canon 3A(3), which requires judges to be patient, dignified and courteous.

The complaint says he repeatedly misused R. 1:2-4 to sanction attorneys and litigants for being a few minutes late, though the rule is meant to apply to failure to appear rather than mere lateness.

In one case, Sasso issued an arrest warrant after Lisa Brown arrived about eight minutes late and missed the initial call in Watchung on July 12, 2007. When she tried to explain that the delay was the result of bringing her child to a babysitter, he imposed a $500 sanction with a threat of jail if she did not pay, the ACJC says.

Contrary to the harsh treatment allegedly meted out to some lawyers and litigants, Sasso gave preferential treatment to high school students by lowering their fines -- what he called the "Warrior Discount," referring to a school mascot. He allegedly conditioned the discount on the students, rather than their parents, paying the fines.

The final count alleges that by acting as attorney for the Watchung Volunteer Fire Company, while he was also the town's judge, Sasso violated R. 1:15-1(b), which prohibits such a dual role.

Sasso, who has not retained a lawyer, says of the charges, "I'm looking forward to a hearing."

"I don't know how the committee attorneys think giving high school kids a break on fines when the vast majority of them aren't working constitutes some kind of improper treatment," he says. "Or that volunteering your time for a volunteer fire department -- that I've worked for since I was 15 years old -- constitutes some type of violation."

He adds that he had back surgery last month and is scheduled for another procedure in April.

RELATED HARASSMENT SUIT

In a pending harassment and whistleblower suit, Michele D'Onofrio alleges that her complaints about Sasso to the ACJC, the township administrator and the Somerset County presiding municipal judge led to her discharge by her firm, DiFrancesco, Bateman, Coley, Yospin, Kunzman, Davis & Lehrer in Warren, where she was a nonequity partner.

D'Onofrio alleges that Sasso was a "political ally, friend and crony" of the firm and that a partner, Sen. Christopher Bateman, R-Somerset, who is also a Bridgewater municipal prosecutor, advised her not to file a grievance.

Bateman, who was present in Sasso's courtroom as prosecutor when Bombelyn was sanctioned, is listed as a reference on Sasso's résumé, posted online at www.sassolaw.com/rsassoresume.htm. Bateman could not be reached for comment.

D'Onofrio declines to comment but her lawyer, Nancy Erika Smith, says the drunkenness charges originated in D'Onofrio's grievance to the ACJC.

Smith, of Smith Mullin in Montclair, also brought the go-go bar incident to the ACJC's attention. She says a person she declines to identify called her and told her Sasso was drunk and throwing his weight around in the bar and she relayed the information to the ACJC, which conducted its own investigation.

Smith says that sometime next month, D'Onofrio will file a whistleblower complaint against Watchung, alleging the town fired her as prosecutor because she complained about Sasso.

According to the Asbury Park Press Web site, Sasso's judgeships drew 2006 salaries of $62,172 in Bridgewater, $48,092 in Warren, $41,669 in Bound Brook and $35,095 in Watchung, for a total of $187,028.

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

THIS IS HOW ROBERT A. FRANCO, ESQ. PROTECTED HIS FORMER CLIENT NORMAN TAUGER.....HE USED HIM FOR A MORTGAGE...


NOW, THE PROPERTY IS BEING FORECLOSED UPON TAUGER IS DESTROYED.


RANDI KERN FRANCO WAS THE REPRESENTING ATTORNEY FOR THE FRAUD.

Friday, February 22, 2008