Re: Judge Frank W. Gasiorowski
Somerset County Sheriff’s Office
Dear Detective Sgt. Fodor,
I am providing this information for your review.
A few other people also have information to pass on to you concerning Judge Gasiorowaski but I have not provided your name. I will, at your request.
I was directed to contact you by Deputy Prosecutor Kolodzieski on January 25, 2007. I had attempted on my own to make a complaint to the Bridgewater Police Department several months ago concerning the Sheriffs’ Department but the Police Officer rejected my complaint.
We, the complainants did however plan to bring attention to our issues but I thought in light of my matter with Robert Franco, Esq. along with the veiled threats and accusation Mr. Franco was sending out, that this information might be better reported down the road. I reconsidered since there has been information and stories about Judge Gasiorowaski reported, hopefully this is an appropriate time.
The initial question arouse when one of my attorneys, Ephraim Jerchower, who represented me with the Villas on the Park Matter, was awarded a fee via the Fee Arbitration Committee despite he signed a retainer for a contingent fee. He terminated the representation and should not have been awarded anything. (Exhibit A).
On May 18, 1989, Mr. Jerchower was awarded, contrary to the laws of arbitration, a fee of $13,128 (Exhibit B). Inclusive of this exhibit presented, is the rule why no fee should be awarded. This is simply the backdrop and at this point moot, but issues of why and how lend itself to the heart of the corruption regarding Somerset County and Judge Gasiorowski.
Fast Forward to Judge Gasiorowski
June 3, 2005
On June 3, 2005, Judge Gasiorowask awarded Mr. Jerchower, $13,129, then amended the amount by adding interest to the “fee judgment” on June 6, 2005 totaling $16,722 putting the claim out of the Special Civil Court ( Exhibit C). Special Civil hears cases ceiling at $15,000. Please note, no address was provided for me the defendant on the court form.
Mr. Jerchower filed his complaint six years after the fee award was issued and one day before the statue of limitation ended. The key issue is, I was never “noticed” that I was being sued. Mr. Jerchower never provided my address. The Court mailed out a post card to only Mr. Jerchower, on May 17, 2005
( Exhibit D) (See all post cards with improper address) that stated that a post card was mailed to me on May 19, 2005, that is impossible and ridiculous. I filed several motions each and every one was denied. Judge Gasioroski favored the attorney. You can see with my speedy response dated June 13, 2005 I provided my proper address but the court refused to use it. I was very suspect of one of the court intake persons at the filing counter. (Exhibit E).
In September, I filed a motion to have the matter transferred to the proper court, I hired a process server to file and somehow with the assistance of the intake clerks my filings became lost and ended up in the Sheriff’s Office. (Exhibit F).
On November 8, 2005, Mr. Jerchower and I entered into a settlement. I went on a payment plan and satisfied our agreement.
In March of 2006, while I was employed in a very stressful position, I had gotten several letters from Bank of America informing me that I was bouncing checks. I got a printout of my account and saw the “Court” along with the Sheriff’s Office was responsible for REMOVING every cent that I had on
March 8, 2005 (Exhibit G).
About ten days later, I received a letter dated March 16, 2005 stating a levy was placed on my account, not stating the truth, that my funds were removed. In addition to the Sheriff’s Office violating the Federal statue, I was entitled to retain a $1,000 of which was Unemployment Funds but instead, every cent was removed. (Exhibit H).
I called the Court Officer, William De Guillo in a panic and he agreed to return my funds after I paid him unrecorded fees of $657.32. I was unable to leave work but a friend Steven Fine took the cash that I had to advance from a credit card in order to give Mr. DiGuillo the “cash” he demanded. (Exhibit I). Mr. De Guillo would not give Mr. Fine a receipt but after much demand he signed the note that I had typed up, See (Exhibit J).
Mr. Jerchower, now feeling badly for me, took immediate efforts to have my funds returned because I was bouncing checks and my mortgage was on a automatic debit account. (Exhibit K).
Mr. De Guillo went back to business as usual and asked the bank to remove the levy on April 5, 2006 but he had never advised Mr. Jerchower the rightful but satisfied creditor that the money had been removed for him. It was simply a case that I had caught it due to bouncing checks. (Exhibit L).
Yours truly,
Cindy Feiler-Jampel
January 27, 2007
Cindy Feiler-Jampel
3308 French Drive
Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807
Telephone: (908) 393 9353
Cell: (732) 713 6254
